Opening Statments
“The opening statement outlines the case it is intended to present. The attorney for plaintiff delivers the first opening statement and the defense follows with the second. A good opening statement should explain what the attorney plans to prove, how it will be proven; mention the burden of proof and applicable law; and present the events (facts) of the case in an orderly, easy to understand manner.” Mock Trial Material from State of Oregon v. Dulsa (2017-18 Season)
An opening statement is not an argument or a discussion of the law, but rather tells the jury what the evidence will show and serves as a road map for the jury to follow. Objections by the opposing counsel are not permitted.
What to know before drafting an opening statement
- Can you tell a brief story about what happened from your side’s point of view?
- What is your theory of the case?
- What are the key elements that have to be proved (by you or the other side)?
- What do you anticipate the evidence will show?
- What are the important facts your side’s witnesses will testify to?
- What themes (words and phrases that convey emotions) do you want to emphasize?
- Who has the burden of proof and what is it?
- What do you want the jury to do?
- How much time do you have? (usually 5 minutes)
Anatomy of an opening: the basics
- AnIntroduction:
- Attorney identifiesthemself (or not)
- A typical introduction:“Your Honor, members of the jury, my name is (full name), representing the prosecution/defendant in this case.”
- If they have already been introduced, some attorneys just go right into their opening to save time, create drama, and make it look more like a real trial.
- A theory of the case
- One or two sentences which tell the jury what your case is about
- “My client, Landry Lopez, was fired for reporting an illegal activity to his employer, the restaurant Buddies Burgers.”
- Briefly tell the jury why they are there
- “This case is brought under Oregon whistle blower law, which prohibits employers for retaliating against employees who have a reasonable belief that an illegal activity has occurred and report it. ”
- A brief overview (story)of what the evidence will show
- Presented from your side’sperspective
- Purpose is to give the jury the big picture
- “The facts of this case are straightforward. The evidence will show that on May 5, 2016, Landry Lopez saw . . .”
- A brief explanation of what has to be proved
- “Under Oregon whistle blower law there are three elements that must be proven. First . .”
- Identify the witnesses
- “We will call three witnesses: Landry Lopez, Sam Jackson, a former Buddies Burgers employee, and Tyler Erickson, a journalist student.”
- Tell what the key testimony of each witness will be
- “Mr. Lopez will tell you that . . .”
- “Next, Plaintiff will call Ms. Jackson, a former BB employee . . “.
- “Finally you will the testimony of Tyler Erickson, who was with Mr. Lopez . . . “
- A conclusion
- Discuss the burden of proof (some put this near the beginning)
- “This is a civil case and Plaintiff Landry Lopez must prove his case by a preponderance of the evidence.” (Explain briefly and illustrate with hands what a preponderance of the evidence means)
- Restate the theory of the case
- “Oregon’s whistle blower law exists to protect, and encourage, employees to report illegal activity in the workplace. Mr. Lopez engaged in such whistle blower activity and was fired for doing so. “
- Tell the jury what you want
- “For these reasons, after you have heard all the evidence, at the end of this trial we will ask you to return a verdict in favor of Landry Lopez.”
- “At the end of the trial the State of Oregon will ask you to find the Defendant guilty of . . . . .”
- “Based on the evidence you will hear, at the end of the trial the Defendant will ask you to return a verdict of not guilty
Going Deeper: Ways to Improve the Opening Statement:
- In a Mock Trial the attorney is judged on:
- Substance and technique . . . AND
- Performance and style
Substance and Technique
- Keep revising your opening until it is exactly as you want it
- Opening statements go through many edits and revisions
- Seek out the input from others
- Try things out – if they don’t work, don’t use them
- Consider a hook in the introduction
- A hook is a sentence or very short paragraph in the introduction which serves as an attention-grabbing element
- The effectiveness of the hook is defined by its ability to interest and motivate the jury to listen more closely
- The hook should arouse interest but not be argumentative
- Tell a good story
- Story telling is at the heart of a good opening
- A story paints a vivid picture – walk jury through it with each witness
- Use active voice
- Use language that reinforces your themes
- Create interest but don’t tell everything
- Do not argue the case
- The opening statement is not an argument
- Do not argue the facts or law
- Save arguments for closing
- It is OK to state and develop your theory of the case
- Stick with what the facts w ill show a nd what they will not show
- Use future tense when talking about what the evidence will show
- Proper phrasing includes statements like:
- “The evidence will indicate that . . .
- “The facts will show that …”
- Use a few of these lines but not too many, don’t overdo it
- Stay in control of the picture you paint in the jury’s mind
- Everything you say should have a purpose
- Don’t ask questions during opening statements (it allows the jury to come up with answers you might not want)
- Do not waste your time on unimportant things or go into excessive detail (may make the jurors lose focus)
- Use descriptive emotional content in describing the most important facts
- State the facts affirmatively – do not negate the other side’s facts or position
- The more you repeat something the more it is remembered and believed
- If you say the evidence will show that“Mrs. Smith did not run the red light,”the‘not’is lost.
- The jury remembers the phrase“ran the red light”
- Instead say the evidence will show“Mrs. Smith came to a complete stop at the signal.”
- The jury remembers “came to a complete stop at the signal.”
- Personalize your side’s witnesses
- Use their names
- Depersonalize the opposition’s witnesses with language like‘Defendant”or“Plaintiff”
- The Prosecution in a criminal case is the Government
- Don’t be shy to take on this role
- Refer to yourself“The State of ___”not just the“prosecution.”
- Talk about facts that are not in dispute (look at the stipulations)
- “There are certain facts in this case that are not in dispute . . . “
- “The Defense/Prosecution have agreed . . .”
- “The parties have agreed that . . . “
Performance and Style
Body language is a very powerful tool. We had body language before we had speech, and apparently, 80% of what you understand in a conversation is read through the body, not the words. – Deborah Bull, English dancer, writer, and broadcaster
- Practice, practice, practice
- Find your focus, energy and commitment
- Memorize the Opening Statement
- Memorize content, movement, inflections, and gestures
- This will maximize the points you will get
- If notes are needed
- Use them sparingly
- Use a legal pad or clip board so they do not flop around
- Talk directly to the jury
- Look them in the eye
- Educate them about the case
- Move closer (5-10 ft.) but not too close
- Be natural to keep their attention
- Use conversational language that is engaging
- Let the type of case dictate your style and tone
- Example: A prosecutor might want to be more forceful whereas a defendant might want to evoke sympathy
- Use legal terminology sparingly
- Use body posture and movement deliberately and consciously
- Maintain upright body posture (do not slouch)
- Keep shoulders back to show confidence
- Stay balanced
- If you move, make the movement coincide with transitions between points
- Try not to change position more than 7 times in 5 minutes
- Try not to fidget or have unnecessary gestures or body movements
- Use gestures
- Use gestures to create interest and drama
- Gestures include the give, the show, the tell, and signposting
- Don’t shy away from pointing to individuals in the court – the type of point may vary
- If you are the prosecution and point to the defendant it will be using a harder accusatory “tell” gesture with a pointed finger
- If you are pointing to your own witnesses it will be using an inviting open handed “give” gesture
- Act professional and confident – even if you are nervous